Charles Cooper tells about his journey to the prewrath position. He also explains how the contradictions in the pretribulational system prompted him to examine Scripture more closely on the rapture question. This presentation was given last October in O’Fallon Missouri at an eschatology forum.
Download as MP3
Hermeneutics
There is a view that asserts that Antichrist’s rule will be regional, not global. There is faulty reasoning to reach this conclusion. Here is my response:
It is said about Antichrist:
. . . and all the world wondered after the beast . . . And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him . . .” (Revelation 13:3,8)
Those verses support the view that the beast will rule over the whole world. The Greek word translated ”world” and ”earth” is gē (γῆ).
The most authoritative lexicon is A Greek – English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature (BDAG). It gives six domain ranges of meaning for this word:
1. surface of the earth as the habitation of humanity, earth
2. the inhabitants of the earth, people, humanity
3. portions or regions of the earth, region, country
4. dry land as opposed to sea, land
5. earth-like surface that forms the bottom of a body of water, ground, bottom
6. earth w. ref. to limited areas and the material that forms its surface
The term is used innumerable times in the New Testament under the first and second senses. It is even used 82 times in the book of Revelation, most of those usages are in a global sense:
Rev 1:5, 7; 3:10; 5:3, 6, 10, 13; 6:4, 8, 10, 13, 15; 7:1-3; 8:5, 7, 13-9:1; 9:3-4; 10:2, 5-6, 8; 11:4, 6, 10, 18; 12:4, 9, 12-13, 16; 13:3, 8, 11-14; 14:3, 6-7, 15-16, 18-19; 16:1-2, 18; 17:2, 5, 8, 18-18:1; 18:3, 9, 11, 23-24; 19:2, 19; 20:8-9, 11; 21:1, 24
The context supports a global sense of the term:
“One of its heads seemed to have a mortal wound, but its mortal wound was healed, and the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast.” (Rev 13:3).
“Also it was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. And authority was given it over every tribe and people and language and nation, and all who dwell on earth will worship it, everyone whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain.” (Rev 13:7-8).
The book of Revelation is not about a local region — but the cosmic, universal world. The phrase “all nations, tribes, peoples, and languages” has a universal thrust in the book of Revelation and there is nothing in this context to suggest that this is an exception limited to “tribes in proximity to Israel.” To list a few references:
“And they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation,” (Rev 5:9).
“After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands” (Rev 7:9).
“And I was told, “You must again prophesy about many peoples and nations and languages and kings.”” (Rev 10:11).
“Then I saw another angel flying directly overhead, with an eternal gospel to proclaim to those who dwell on earth, to every nation and tribe and language and people.” (Rev 14:6).
Further, there is a contrast of the symbolism between the second beast rising out of the earth with the first beast rising out of the sea (Rev 13:1). The same term is used in a similar context of previous beasts who arise out of the earth to attain power: “These four great beasts are four kings who shall arise out of the earth.” (Dan 7:17). This is an expression that indicates an emergence into power that was not previously possessed. It does not require a meaning of a particular region.
Next, the lexicon, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, lists gē as a synonym with kosmos, a word that has primarily a “universal” sense.
Some argue:
“The third kingdom of brass which would bear rule over ”ALL THE EARTH” is the Grecian Empire of Alexander the Great. A map of the Grecian Empire will reveal that it DID NOT rule the whole world but only extended from Macedon in the West to the Indus River which is the border between India and Pakistan. It did not even extend to Western Europe. Now if the third kingdom which would bear rule over ”all the earth” did not rule the whole world, is it not incorrect to believe that the fourth kingdom which shall bear rule over ”all the earth” will not rule the whole modern world but only a portion of it?
What this fails to see is that the future Antichrist’s empire is not going to be limited by borders, as if the future Antichrist is going to be limited to chariots and spears.
It also fails to note Daniel 2:35, which uses the same term, “whole earth”: “But the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.” (Dan 2:35). According to this reasoning then, the Lord’s kingdom in this verse will only be limited to the middle east, not a literal whole earth.
Finally, it may be asserted that another word such as οἰκουμένη oikoumenē cannot have a global sense, but only a:
“portion of the inhabited earth inhabited by the Greeks in distinction from the lands of the barbarians.t does not refer to the globe or the entire planet as the word kosmos. The word is sometimes used in connection with the Roman Empire and its subjects.
But the word, οἰκουμένη, oikoumenē, does in fact have a meaning according to the Greek New Testament lexicon, BDAG: “the whole inhabited earth.” How can anyone understand the following verses to be limited to only the Greek region:
“because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.”” (Acts 17:31).
“And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world–he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.” (Rev 12:9).
“And again, when he brings the firstborn into the world, he says, “Let all God’s angels worship him.”” (Heb 1:6).
“Now it was not to angels that God subjected the world to come, of which we are speaking.” (Heb 2:5).
“For they are demonic spirits, performing signs, who go abroad to the kings of the whole world, to assemble them for battle on the great day of God the Almighty.” (Rev 16:14).
Sound exegesis does effect real-life practical theology.
Pretribulationsts are teaching that the Church will not experience the Great Tribulation; and Preterists are claiming that the Church will not be in the Great Tribulation in the future; and some who argue that the universal Church will not be included in Antichrist’s realm since it will only be local.
But difficult times are coming upon the universal Church. God will call the last generation of the universal Church to experience the wrath of Antichrist. We need to be prepared with good teaching, and a blameless heart.
Matthew 24, The End of the Age, Pretribulationism, “Accusative for Extent of Time” (Always, πάσας τὰς ἡμέρας)
Yes, all those topics are related! Let me explain.
I had a Greek professor once who would often cite Greek grammatical categories to rule out particular interpretations of a Biblical text (that is an essential practice for good exegesis). For example, he would say, “This doctrine cannot be true because of the perfect, passive, present, participle.” I enjoyed this because it demonstrated the Protestant spirit that you did not have to learn grammatical categories from a pope or some magisterial teaching authority. The priesthood of believers allows each individual to interpret the Scriptures accordingly. This does not mean that every believer is going to have the learned skills to discern all the subtleties of Greek for example. But it shows that it is available.
For those who know the original languages of Greek and Hebrew, they understand that grammatical categories, most of the time, cannot give you the precise meaning of an interpretation, but it often eliminates dubious meanings and narrows the options. Or said another way: Exegesis has never been about possibility, it is about probability.
That being said…
Pretribulationists assert that the events in Matthew 24 do not apply to the Church, but rather the teaching is for a future generation of “saved Jews” (apparently not part of the Church) who will experience the Second Coming. And often you will hear them qualify this by saying, “But there is some spiritual application in Matthew 24 for the Church.” I find this latter statement quite odd since the spiritual warnings in Matthew 24 depend on the doctrinal teaching. To detach the spiritual application of “watchfulness” found in vv. 36ff., from the doctrinal teaching found in vv. 1-35, is to violate all sorts of interpretative sound principles. This inconsistency is indicative of a tradition.
Pre-wrath literature abounds in argumentation demonstrating that the Church is the primary audience of Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 24. One particular argument I want to address is that Jesus says that the Church will be here until the end of the age; as well, he promises the Church that he will be with them, through the Holy Spirit, to the end of the age. In the Great Commission passage, it says,
“And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. (19) Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, (20) teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always [πάσας τὰς ἡμέρας], to the end of the age.” –Matt 28:18-20
It is significant in this verse that the word “always” is found in the accusative case in Greek, not the genitive case. As a general rule, the accusative functions to limit the quantity (extent), and the genitive used to limit quality (kind). And when the accusative is used adverbially, as in this verse, this is particularly significant. Here we have what is called an “accusative for extent of time,” which answers “How long?”
If “always” was placed in the genitive, then Jesus would have been saying that he would be with them during this present Church age, but not necessarily the entire Church age and to the end of the age. But Jesus’ choice of the accusative assures that Jesus will be with believers to the extent of the entire Church age, up to the end of the age. (cf. Greek Grammar: Beyond the Basics, Wallace, 201-203.)
The following two concepts are illustrated:
This brings me to my main point. In the Olivet Discourse, we have two references to the end of the age. First, the discourse begins with the disciples asking a question of what would be the sign of the end of the age (v. 3). The second reference is Matthew 24:14, which Jesus says,
“And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.”
These references to the end of the age are problematic for the pretribulationist who says that Matthew 24 is not a teaching for the Church. Since all pretribulationists would affirm that Matthew 28:18-20 is a teaching for the Church and that Jesus is with his Church to the end of the age, why all of a sudden in Matthew 24:3,14 is the Church no longer found to exist up to the end?
There is no Scriptural basis for this inconsistency. It’s indicative of Tradition. Further, pretribulationists are in direct disobedience to Jesus’ command in Matthew 28:20, “teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you,” when they teach believers that Jesus’ commands in the Olivet Discourse do not apply to them.
To get around this plain teaching I have even heard some pretribulationists assert that there are two “end of the ages”! That is a desperate attempt at reconciling their pretrib tradition while denying Jesus’ teaching.
Let’s thank the Lord that his particular promise is found in the “Accusative for Extent of Time” and thereby he will not leave his Church during the greatest of all tribulations!
Charles Cooper explains the starting point, nature, and cutting off point of the Great Tribulation. This event that is associated with Antichrist’s persecution against the Church is not to be confused with the event of the Day of the Lord’s wrath, which follows after the Great Tribulation. This presentation was given last October in O’Fallon Missouri at an Eschatology forum.
Download as MP3
At the 2008 Orlando Prewrath Conference, Charles Cooper gave a lecture on Matthew’s interpretive employment of “Pattern Fulfillment.” Cooper also explains that each of the gospel writers contain key metaphors that serve to illuminate Jesus’ teaching of his Return.
Download as MP3