I thought I would list some of our popular articles from the past. As a reminder, the archive can be searched from the search box, topic categories, authors, and by the month. Our free audio is always popular but the following is a list of popular articles (just copy and paste the address into your browser):
The most popular of course is Coop’s article on his explanation of Prewrath
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2005/11/the_prewrath_rapture_1.php
Both the Rapture and the Onset of the Day of the Lord’s Wrath Occur on the Same Day.
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2008/03/both_the_rapture_and_the_onset_of_the_da.php
The First Six Seals Are Not God’s Wrath
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2007/10/the_first_six_seals_are_not_gods_wrath.php
Learn about Amillennialism’s origins in Church history. (Ignore the question marks in the article since I need to convert them to quotation marks. When we changed to a new publishing platform it affected some articles which I need to fix soon).
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2007/07/amillennialism_examining_its_origens.php
Consistency Between Jesus and Paul: The Singular Future Parousia of Christ
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2006/09/consistency_between_jesus_and_paul.php
The word “church” being absent from Revelation 4-19
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2006/01/a_reply_to_the_pretrib_argument_the_word.php
A Case for the Prewrath Rapture: the “Cosmic Disturbances”
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2006/0/a_case_for_the_prewrath_rapture_the_cosm.php
Premillennial Nuggets – A Challenge to Amillennialists to Read “Revelation 20” in Context
https://www.prewrathrapture.com/2008/07/a_challenge_to_amillennialists_to_read_r.php
Category:
Prewrath
The term “Prewrath” is a popular term today and many are eager to latch on that term by appropriating it even when their view of end-times has no resemblance with the tenets of the Prewrath position. I have seen more than a few individuals on the Internet who claim to be “prewrath.” For example some of these folks would assert that the Church is raptured before the 70th week of Daniel. Sound familiar? Or the Church is raptured at the midpoint. Again, sound familiar? Some insist that they are prewrath and can hold to imminence!
What makes matters worse is that there are bloggers who have written articles outlining the different end-time views and when they get to the prewrath position I am left just shaking my head — and of course you will find no documentation for their definition of prewrath (this is on a weekly basis).
In an Internet age in which many people struggle to read something more than the length of a haiku, it may be expected that we find this lack of accuracy and willingness.
It is not that the Prewrath position is inflexible on all its interpretations. But it is a different matter when individuals deny definitional tenets of prewrath but continue to claim to be prewrath. This engenders confusion with God’s people looking for answers. It is dishonest, in short — and the abode of cyberspace is not immune from God’s eyes.
I thought I would provide one example of this to illustrate. There is no particular reason to single out this person, it could have been someone else. I asked Darrin to respond to one individual, Ken Schweizer.
There are some people out there using the term PreWrath, but in such a way that the PreWrath position is not represented. Zelma Pack, who maintains a Pre-Trib Rapture position, has a blog entitled The Rose of Sharon is Jesus. Zelma posted an article on her blog by Ken Schweizer entitled “Pre-Tribulation Rapture”. You can read the entire article at this link here.
http://sharonsrose.blogspot.com/2008/06/pre-tribulation-rapture.html
The interesting thing about this article is that Ken opens up saying that he believes in a PreWrath rapture. Here is his quote. “I must state, up front, that I believe in a pre-wrath rapture. That (in my opinion) places the rapture either before the revealing of the antichrist or before the sixth seal of Rev 6:12, but I am leaning toward the first or a pre-tribulation rapture.”
By using the term PreWrath, Ken causes confusion with the PreWrath position. One of the basic tenets of PreWrath is to distinguish between tribulation and wrath. Most PreTribbers just assert that these terms are the synonymous when they are not, and Ken does this very thing departing from the PreWrath view. Here is what he states: “The word says that the Tribulation is the wrath of the Lamb. Re 6:16-17 & Re 14:10. The word says that we are not appointed unto wrath. – 1Thes 5:9, John 3:36.”
So Ken’s appropriation of the term PreWrath is not in accordance with the established position. The PreWrath position maintains that the church will enter the Great Tribulation, but Ken rejects this idea. Later in his article, Ken actually concedes the difference between persecution and wrath. He writes, “There is no similarity between persecution and the wrath of God and any attempt to do so is ridiculous. There have always been tribulations for believers and the Church, but none brought on by The Lord Jesus Christ like when He opens the seven sealed book. That is reserved for non-believers.” So Ken actually has the blueprint for PreWrath in this nugget of truth. Now if we can just get him to see that this truth applies to the Great Tribulation contained in the seven sealed scroll as well as any tribulation for the Word.
The main point of departure from PreWrath can be easily seen in Ken’s opening line. PreWrathers know that the rapture will occur just after the sixth seal which ends the Great Tribulation and begins the wrath of God. It is something that is an essential part of the term PreWrath. Unless you state upfront that you believe at least at minimum:
#1- the church will enter the Great Tribulation which begins at the midpoint of Daniel’s seventieth week,
#2- the church will be raptured just after the sixth seal and at coming of Christ which ends the Great Tribulation, and
#3- the wrath of God begins after the rapture of the church has occurred,
then you cannot begin to think of yourself as PreWrath in accordance with the established position.
The point here is that we must examine when someone uses the term PreWrath to see if they agree with the basic tenets of the position. Just because they say they are PreWrath does not mean they hold to what is definitional of the PreWrath outworking. Thanks to Ken for allowing his article to be referenced so that others may study for themselves. I would encourage prophecy students to follow the link and read his article as it does contain many good things. Also, scroll down and read my personal correspondence to Ken which Zelma graciously posted for readers to see under the comments section.
Have fun and stay busy – Luke 19:13
-The Orange Mailman
Jacob’s Trouble – Jeremiah 30:7
written by Alan Kurschner
The following is from the Parousia Newsletter, Spring of 2001,
Jeremiah 30:7 also speaks of a “troubler of Israel.” This passage is perhaps the most often quoted text by pretribulationists to defend their supposition that Daniel’s Seventieth Week pertains to Israel and not the church. Jeremiah writes, “Alas!” For that day is great, there is none like it; and it is the time of Jacob’s trouble, but he will be saved from it.” Does this prophecy automatically exclude the church from the “tribulation?” Who is he that is the eschatological troubler of Israel? Whose wrath will Jacob be saved from? These and other questions require a careful look at Jeremiah 30:7 and its context.
Pretribulationists are quick to offer their opinions concerning the meaning and significance of Jeremiah 30:7. However, few offer exegetical details to support their claims. What is offered is a litany of less than cogent arguments without explicit scriptural basis. The fundamental flaw in the thinking of pretribulationists is their insistence that Daniel’s Seventieth Week is (1) Jewish in focus and (2) seven years of tribulation (God’s wrath in varying degrees). Both points are supported with arguments of scriptural silence instead of explicit scriptural statements….
To read this entire seminal article by Charles Cooper, click here for download.
The “Coming” (Parousia) and the “Day of the Lord” are Interchangeable (Co-Referential) Terms
written by Alan Kurschner
The New Testament writers including Jesus understood that the “Day of the Lord” and the “Coming” (Parousia) denoted the same events at Christ’s Return (deliverance of the godly and judgment on the ungodly.) The two terms often emphasize different aspects of Christ’s Return — “Coming” with deliverance, and “Day of the Lord” with the judgment aspect.
Peter provides us with an excellent example in which he freely interchanges these two terms denoting the same event of the conflagration of creation:
(10) But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up. (11) Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, what sort of people ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, (12) looking for and hastening the coming (parousia) of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning, and the elements will melt with intense heat. – 2Pet 3:10-12
The term “parousia” is the Greek term behind many of the references to the Coming of Christ in our English Bibles. It is one of the most important terms in eschatology. It is a rich term and has nuance depending how an author used it. Charles Cooper devoted a chapter to its usage in his most recent book, God’s Elect and the Great Tribulation.
And I would like to refer you to the inaugural issue of the Parousia Newsletter titled “What’s in a Name?” which discusses this all-important term. You can download the backissue here. To be able to read the newsletter you need the Adobe Reader which you can download here if you do not already have it.