Amillennialist Jason Robertson of the FIDE-O blog (who I otherwise enjoy reading on other subjects) was asked on his blog if he ever studied Prewrath. His response was this:
[Yes] I studied the Prewrath view and found it seriously lacking biblical continuity. It denies the New Covenant, it denies the kingdom of God, it denies the glory of the exalted enthroned Christ, it denies the Book of Hebrews, it denies the Gospel of John, it denies the Book of Romans, it denies the sermons of Peter in Acts, and it completely interprets Revelation wrongly for it doesn’t even understand that the “wrath” described in Revelation is a covenantal wrath against the covenant breakers of old Israel and was poured out upon it in the first century just as Jesus promised.
For a second there I thought he was going to say that prewrath even denies God’s existence!
