The Council of Europe Document – Dogmatic Secularistic Fundamentalism

James R. White writes,

I have added a new category here on the blog: persecution. We all know that our brothers and sisters are persecuted around the world by repressive regimes, whether they be atheistic/communistic (North Korea, for example), or religious (Islamic, Hindu). But it is no longer any secret at all that secularists want to silence Christians, whether they be of the dogmatic Darwinist sort (Dawkins) or others, such as the homosexual lobby.
We saw just recently that the Council of Europe (part of the EU) put forward document 11375 (17/9/2007 — in European date order, which makes more sense, in this case, than the standard US format) titled “The dangers of creationism in education.” The document can be found here. There is no room for debate, no room for discussion or dispute, as the document begins with its summary, “Creationism in any of its forms, such as ‘intelligent design’, is not based on facts, does not use any scientific reasoning and its contents are definitely inappropriate for science classes.” Well there you go! That settles it! Just as Rome attempted to silence criticism of its own misunderstandings centuries ago in Europe, no one seems to have learned a thing during the intervening centuries. While once it was religious bigotry that stifled the very ability of man to speak and debate and argue and disagree, now the secularist bigots have taken control, and they are just as intent upon stifling free speech and the expression of opposing viewpoints as ever their religious ancestors did.
Dogmatically committed to Darwinism with a fervor of faith beyond almost anything known today in European “Christianity,” the Secular Kingdom of Europe has firmly established its credentials as hating God’s law, hating God’s Word, and hating God’s truth. You will love homosexuality, abortion, and everything else that eats at the soul of man, or you will be an outcast, and feel the brunt of the heel of the kingdom’s boot. Of course, secularist Europe cannot withstand the onslaught of Islam, for the secularist is concerned only about himself or herself, and hence simply does not reproduce. So this monument to man’s hatred of God will be washed away in short order by the natural reproduction rates of the immigrant Islamic populations, and the work of persecuting Christians, begun by the secularist regimes, will fall to those with far more experience in that field.
There are so many contradictions and absurdities in the Council of Europe document that it takes one’s breath away. It is a monument to dogmatic secularistic fundamentalism. It does not even show a passing familiarity with the key issues in the debate, but, how could it? Darwinists do not want their theory debated. They want it obeyed. Period.
So today I was pointed to another indication of the incessant bent of the Western Rebel toward hatred of God. Here is another move to shut the mouths of those who would speak God’s Word in the UK. I have documented numerous times on this blog the push to establish “gay super rights.” Homosexuals, constantly suppressing the voice of conscience, want no one adding to that monumental effort by speaking the truth they are working so hard to suppress. So they seek to silence those who would say homosexuality is a life-destroying, culture damaging addiction by force of law. “Hate crimes” legislation is nothing more than a means of giving the government the right to peer into the hearts and minds on the basis of its own prejudice. It is a mechanism to suppress expression of “politically incorrect” views. We watched the old Soviet Union use these kinds of laws for decades as a basis for its brutal suppression of free thought, and now the West is mimicking its vanquished foe. While it will take longer for these laws to come to full effect in the US, the process has already begun. Free speech is now only for those who wish to promote godlessness thereby.
In a wonderful display of irony, I paged down to find one Dan from Sheffield making a comment on the news story. He concluded his comments with, “laws against incitement to hatred already exist for other things, this just extends that legal standard, and should extend equally, to everyone, whatever sky pixie they happen to believe in.” Why shouldn’t Dan’s description of my God as a “sky pixie” fall under the very same prohibitions of “hate speech”? No one can answer that question, since logic and reason are not relevant to those who promote this kind of mindless “political correctness.”
The days of our freedom to speak are numbered in the West, my friends. We must take advantage of them while we can! It will not be long before “counting the cost” will finally have meaning for those of us who have been blessed with unlimited freedom for a very long time.