PreWrathRapture.Com
  • Home
  • About
    • About PR.COM
    • What is Prewrath
  • Media
    • Blog
    • YouTube
    • Audio
    • Joining our Zoom Meetings
  • PreWrath Timeline
  • contact
  • Español
  • Store
  • Hermeneutics
  • Home
  • About
    • About PR.COM
    • What is Prewrath
  • Media
    • Blog
    • YouTube
    • Audio
    • Joining our Zoom Meetings
  • PreWrath Timeline
  • contact
  • Español
  • Store
  • Hermeneutics
PreWrathRapture.Com
HermeneuticsRevelation

Part 8 – A Response to “The Uncertainty of the Timing of the Rapture”

by Alan Kurschner December 5, 2009
written by Alan Kurschner

I am continuing my response to Pastor Bob DeWaay. This next part of his presentation is quite interesting. First, he notes this text:

And I said to him, “My lord, you know.” And he said to me, “These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.” (Rev. 7:14)

He says that this body of believers who have come out of the Great Tribulation is “a church.” Notice the indefinite article. I will come back to that in a moment. At this point in his lecture, he says that he disagrees with his pretrib friends who say that there is not a church during the Tribulation. Indeed, DeWaay does affirm that there is a rapture of the Church before the tribulation, but he also identifies a church in Rev 7:14 who has just come out of a great tribulation. Here is the reason why he thinks “a church” is identified in Revelation 7:14. He asserts:

“[W]hat is the definition of the [word] ‘church’? ‘the called-out ones.'”

This is demonstrably false. The Greek word for “church” is ekklesia, ἐκκλησία, which means “assembly, congregation, gathering, church.” One will not find a credible Greek lexicon listing the meaning of this word as “called-out ones.” One authoritative Greek lexicon even has this to say:

Though some persons have tried to see in the term ἐκκλησία a more or less literal meaning of ‘called-out ones,’ this type of etymologizing is not warranted either by the meaning of ἐκκλησία in NT times or even by its earlier usage. (Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. 2d, Accordance electronic ed., version 3.8. New York: United Bible Societies, 1989.)

Moreover, both D.A. Carson and Moises Silva actually use this very term as a paragon for a lexical fallacy. See respectively, Exegetical Fallacies; and Biblical Words and Their Meaning: An Introduction to Lexical Semantics.
So these lexical facts undermine DeWaay’s theology of having “a” church in Revelation 7:14, as if there is another church raptured before the Great Tribulation. The Church is seen in Revelation 7:14, not because the word “church” means “called-out ones,” but because the rapture/resurrection occurs between the sixth seal and the seventh seal, consistent with Matthew 24.
He may disagree with pretribulationists with how to label these saints in Revelation 7:14: “tribulation saints” or “a church.” Don’t let that mislead you because DeWaay agrees substantially with pretribulationists that there is a rapture of the Church before the Tribulation. So consequently, DeWaay’s position blunts the warnings of Christ because he still affirms that there will be a rapture before the Antichrist’s Great Tribulation. And this is in direct contradiction to our Lord’s teaching in Matthew 24.
We do know for certain who these warnings apply to in the Bible: the last generation of the present Church—not, as DeWaay would like us to think, a second created church that comes along after the rapture.
His position cannot explain the real warnings that Paul and Jesus make for the Church. And to place them in a “possible other church” context is exegetically unsupported and diminishes the force of Jesus and Paul’s Biblical teaching.

December 5, 2009 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Hermeneutics

Part 7 – A Response to “The Uncertainty of the Timing of the Rapture”

by Alan Kurschner December 5, 2009
written by Alan Kurschner

I am continuing my response to Pastor Bob DeWaay. He believes that prophecy (related to Christ’s Second Coming) is not given in chronological order in the Bible for this reason:

“[W]e can see prophecies in the Old Testament about Christ’s Coming that contains both first and second advent material not necessarily in order.”

There you go. That is his reason. Never mind that this is an illogical inference. And never mind bothering to look to see if God’s progressive revelation in the New Testament may have something to say about this. For DeWaay, since God did not reveal in the Old Testament a chronological relationship between the first and second coming, the New Testament therefore does not give a chronology of his Second Coming. He is adducing a logical deductive reason, not an inductive reason from the New Testament.
He does not explain how his premise (God did not reveal specific information in the OT) necessarily infers his conclusion (God did not reveal specific information in the NT).
Not only is this a logically unsound and invalid argument, but I have shown in Parts 3-5 in this series that the New Testament provides a clear chronological framework of Christ’s Second Coming.

December 5, 2009 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Daniel

Part 6 – A Response to “The Uncertainty of the Timing of the Rapture”

by Alan Kurschner December 5, 2009
written by Alan Kurschner

I am continuing my response to Pastor Bob DeWaay. He asserts:

“Prophecy is not given in chronological order in the Bible. You need to know that.”

We have made a case that the Bible does indeed emphatically contain prophetic chronological material in Matthew 24, Thessalonians, and Revelation.
There are other prophetic passages in the Bible that contain chronological information, but I want to mention two final texts in Daniel that are incredibly insightful. I direct the reader to this article on page 3 of the section entitled “An Overview of Daniel 7.” One will observe a consistency with Revelation’s teaching.
The second text is Daniel 12:1-3. Again, note the consistency with the Olivet Discourse: Great Tribulation followed by the resurrection.
I find it ironic the DeWaay talks about a “composite” for eschatological events. Yet, he is not able to see the most conspicuous, consistent composite in Scripture of a basic eschatological framework: (1) Antichrist’s Revelation (midpoint) (2) Antichrist’s Great Tribulation against God’s People (3) The Resurrection-Rapture (4) The Day of the Lord’s Wrath (5) The Reclamation of God’s Kingdom on Earth.
And one will search in vain for a pretrib rapture that occurs before # 1.

December 5, 2009 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Revelation

Part 5 – A Response to “The Uncertainty of the Timing of the Rapture”

by Alan Kurschner December 5, 2009
written by Alan Kurschner

I am continuing my response to Pastor Bob DeWaay. He asserts:

“Prophecy is not given in chronological order in the Bible. You need to know that.”

I would like to ask DeWaay if the thinks the seals, trumpets, and bowls can unfold in any order. And if so, how do we know that? For example, could it be the case that the bowls occur before the seals? Or can the 7th seal, for example, occur before the first seal? I don’t know of a single interpreter that would argue for that. Everyone that I am familiar with argues that the second seal occurs chronologically after the first seal (i.e., first, second, third, and so on). And for good reason: they are ordinal numbers. And since they occur in the context of Revelation as enumerating historical (in time) events they are chronological.
Further, there are good reasons to believe that the three septets of seal, trumpets, and bowls unfold consecutively, not concurrently (My appendix in my forthcoming book is devoted to this question).
Will the Battle of Armageddon occur before the seals, trumpets, and bowls. Of course not, since Revelation places it as a climax of God’s wrath on earth. So there is a basic chronological order to the book of Revelation.
In addition to the larger chronological framework, you have the particular prewrath interpretation of the special chronological elements, which have been expounded on this blog for many years. I see no evidence that DeWaay is remotely familiar with the Prewrath argumentation for the chronology in Revelation. Rather than repeating it all here, I direct the reader to the following exegetical articles here, and here. Also, this site is helpful.
Finally, the interpreter of Revelation who fails to take into consideration the Olivet Discourse as a framework will fail to be informed by Jesus’ general chronology: Beginning of Birth Pangs, Antichrist’s Great Tribulation, Parousia/Day of the Lord. This also helps to discern parenthetical sections in the book of Revelation. One would expect this consistency between Matthew 24 and the book of Revelation, since they are both teachings from our Lord and found in an eschatological context.

December 5, 2009 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Thessalonians 1&2

Part 4 – A Response to “The Uncertainty of the Timing of the Rapture”

by Alan Kurschner December 2, 2009
written by Alan Kurschner

I am continuing my response to Pastor Bob DeWaay. He asserts:

“Prophecy is not given in chronological order in the Bible. You need to know that.”

The Apostle Paul would take issue to DeWaay’s assertion, since Paul wrote two Thessalonian epistles with the thrust being a chronological order. There was confusion in the Thessalonian church about the connection between the Coming (parousia) of Christ for the believers who would be alive and the resurrection of the dead in Christ. Paul assures and comforts them by informing them that the resurrection is not disconnected from the Coming. How does Paul specifically clarify their confusion? By couching it in explicit chronological language. Observe:

“For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. (16) For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. (17) Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord.” (1 Thess 4:15-17).

After the clarity of his teaching, a few months later Paul receives word back that the Thessalonians are confused because there are some who are trying to teach them that the resurrection and Day of the Lord has already happened. Accordingly, Paul writes back in no uncertain terms that not only has the resurrection and Day of the Lord not occurred yet, but as proof of this he tells them that two pivotal events must occur first: the revelation of Antichrist, and a definitive rebellion (apostasy). In other words, since these two events have not occurred yet, the Thessalonians can know that the resurrection and Day of the Lord has not happened. Paul again couches his prophecy in explicit chronological language:

“Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, (2) not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. (3) Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, (4) who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. (5) Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? (6) And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time. (7) For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way. (8) And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth and bring to nothing by the appearance of his coming. (9) The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, (10) and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.” (2 Thess 2:1-10).

To deny this chronological language is simply an indication of a Tradition getting in the way of this teaching.

December 2, 2009 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Search

Recent Posts

  • Elements of Bible Study

    July 28, 2021
  • Exegetical Gymnastics: The Tortious Interpretive Method of Pretribbers

    May 19, 2020
  • Digital Based PreWrath Gatherings!

    April 25, 2020

Categories


Enter Email for Blog Updates






Resources

International Prewrath

  • Chinese
  • Dutch
  • Spanish
  • Facebook
  • RSS

@2019 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign


Back To Top